FOREIGN LEARNERS’ PERCEPTION, SATISFACTION, AND LEARNING OUTCOME IN LEARNING INDONESIAN LANGUAGE

Imam Suyitno, Kusubakti Andayani, Peni Dyah Anggari, Taufiq Kurniawan, Heni Dwi Arista

Abstract


Indonesian language learning institute for foreign learners emphasizes on increasing the experiences and skills of foreigners to speak Indonesian in the real context. One of the models used to achieve this is by optimizing the learning process. Therefore, this research studied the learning model and its impact on the perceptions, satisfaction, and outcomes using qualitative and quantitative approaches. The sample study consists of 21 foreign learners and 10 tutors. Data were obtained from the experiential-tutorial learning, scores of perception, satisfaction, and outcomes through interviews, questionnaires, and tutor assessment on the speaking abilities recorded on document sheets. The study found that the experiential-tutorial learning was developed based on the learners’ daily communication needs. The statistical analysis results showed that the average scores of their perception, satisfaction, and learning outcomes were in the high category. Therefore, foreign learners have a good perception and high learning satisfaction in conducting experiential-tutorial learning to increase their outcomes. These findings indicate that experiential-tutorial learning is an effective model for foreign language learners.




Keywords


experiential-tutorial learning; perception; satisfaction; learning outcome; learning Indonesian; foreign learners

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abante, M. E. R., Almendral, B. C., Manansala, J. E., & Manibo, J. (2014). Learning Styles and Factors Affecting the Learning of General Engineering Students. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 3(1), 16–27. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v3-i1/500.

Ahlsén, E. (2005). Argumentation with restricted linguistic ability: Performing a role play with aphasia or in a second language. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 19(5), 433–451. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699200400027205.

Armstrong, E., & Ferguson, A. (2010). Language, meaning, context, and functional communication. Aphasiology, 24(4), 480–496. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687030902775157.

Bax, S. (2003). The end of CLT: A context approach to language teaching. ELT Journal, 57(3), 278–287. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/57.3.278.

Becker, A., Matsugu, S., & Al-Surmi, M. (2017). Balancing practicality and construct representativeness for IEP speaking tests. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 2(18), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-017-0041-z.

Benade, L. (2015). Teaching as inquiry: Well-intentioned, but fundamentally flawed. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 50(1), 107–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40841-015-0005-0.

Bloom, M., & Gascoigne, C. (2017). Creating experiential learning opportunities for language learners: Acting locally while thinking globally. England: Multilingual Matters.

Burbules, N. C. (2012). Ubiquitous learning and the future of teaching. Encounters in Theory and History of Education, 13, 3–14. https://doi.org/10.24908/eoe-ese-rse.v13i0.4472.

Carbon, C.-C. (2014). Understanding human perception by human-made illusions. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8(566). https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00566.

Cook, V. (2017). Second language learning and language teaching (5th ed). New York, NY: Routledge.

DeBourgh, G. A. (1999). Technology is the tool, teaching is the task: Student satisfaction in distance learning. In J. Price, J. Willis, D. Willis, M. Jost & S. Boger-Mehall (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 1999-Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference. Waynesville, NC USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), (pp. 131-137). https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/7521/.

Eggins, S., & Slade, D. (2005). Analyzing casual conversation (New edition). United Kingdom: Equinox Publishing Limited.

Ellis, R. A., Goodyear, P., Calvo, R. A., & Prosser, M. (2008). Engineering students’ conceptions of and approaches to learning through discussions in face-to-face and online contexts. Learning and Instruction, 18(3), 267–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.06.001.

Green, H. J., Hood, M., & Neumann, D. L. (2015). Predictors of student satisfaction with university psychology courses: A review. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 14(2), 131–146. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475725715590959.

Gusnawaty, G., & Nurwati, A. (2019). A learning model of bahasa Indonesia as a foreign language based on local intercultural politeness. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 38(1), 141–155. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v38i1.23164.

Hardini, T. I., Setyarini, S., & Harto, S. (2019). Indonesian language assistant program in Australian schools: Recruitment and selection process. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 38(2), 330–342. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v38i2.25083.

Hennig-Thurau, T., Langer, M. F., & Hansen, U. (2016). Modeling and managing student loyalty: An approach based on the concept of relationship quality. Journal of Service Research, 3(4), 331–344. https://doi.org/10.1177/109467050134006.

Herdlein, R., & Zurner, E. (2015). Student satisfaction, needs, and learning outcomes: A case study approach at a European University. SAGE Open, 5(2), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244015580373.

Kekkonen-Moneta, S., & Moneta, G. B. (2002). E-learning in Hong Kong: Comparing learning outcomes in online multimedia and lecture versions of an introductory computing course. British Journal of Educational Technology, 33(4), 423–433. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8535.00279.

Klein, W. A. (2009). Pendekatan baru strategi belajar mengajar berdasarkan CBSA (cet. 5). [A new approach to teaching and learning strategies based on CBSA]. Bandung: Sinar Baru Algensindo.

Knight, P. T. (2002). Summative assessment in higher education: Practices in disarray. Studies in Higher Education, 27(3), 275–286. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070220000662.

Knutson, S. (2003). Experiential learning in second-language classrooms. TESL Canada Journal, 20(2), 52–64. https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v20i2.948.

Lam, R. (2015). Language assessment training in Hong Kong: Implications for language assessment literacy. Language Testing, 32(2), 169–197. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532214554321.

Louhiala-Salminen, L., & Kankaanranta, A. (2011). Professional communication in a global business context: The notion of global communicative competence. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 54(3), 244–262. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2011.2161844.

McFarlane, K. J. (2016). Tutoring the tutors: Supporting effective personal tutoring. Active Learning in Higher Education, 17(1), 77–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787415616720.

McKay, M., Davis, M., & Fanning, P. (2009). Messages: The communication skills book. Oakland, CA: New Harbinger Publications.

Moon, J. A. (2009). A handbook of reflective and experiential learning: Theory and practice. New York, NY: Routledge.

Morrison, G. R., Ross, S. M., & Kemp, J. E. (2004). Designing effective instruction (4th ed). Boulevard: Wiley Publishing Inc.

Naaj, M. A., Nachouki, M., & Ankit, A. (2012). Evaluating student satisfaction with blended learning in a gender-segregated environment. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 11, 185–200. https://doi.org/10.28945/1692.

Oliver, R. L. (1999). Whence consumer loyalty? Journal of Marketing, 63(4_suppl1), 33–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222429990634s105.

Osborne, M. (2016). Innovative learning environments. CORE Education White Paper.

Palomba, C. A., & Banta, T. W. (1999). Assessment essentials: Planning, implementing and improving assessment in higher education (1st ed). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

Pooley, J. A., & O’Connor, M. (2000). Environmental education and attitudes: Emotions and beliefs are what is needed. Environment and Behavior, 32(5), 711–723. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916500325007.

Rajprasit, K., & Hemchua, S. (2015). The English language & communication in the international workplace: An examination of thai computer engineering professionals. 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature, 21(3), 109–124. http://ejournals.ukm.my/3l/article/view/9222.

Razinkina, E., Pankova, L., Trostinskaya, I., Pozdeeva, E., Evseeva, L., & Tanova, A. (2018). Student satisfaction as an element of education quality monitoring in innovative higher education institution. E3S Web of Conferences, 33, 03043. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20183303043.

Roberts, J. (2016). Language teacher education. London: Routledge.

Rostami, F., & Zafarghandi, A. M. (2014). EAP needs analysis in Iran: The case of university students in Chemistry Department. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 5(4), 924-934. https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.5.4.924-934.

Sani, R. A. (2013). Inovasi pembelajaran. [Learning innovation]. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Shrestha, R. N., Pahari, B. R., & Awasthi, J. R. (2017). Importance of English in engineering for professional communication: A study in the Nepalese context. Journal of the Institute of Engineering, 12(1), 222-227. https://doi.org/10.3126/jie.v12i1.16906.

Siswanto, S., Karimullah, K., Prasetyawati, R., & Nurhayati, N. (2019). Environmental cultured education and its implication on the student’s competencies in an Adiwiyata school. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 38(3), 552–564. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v38i3.23154.

Taguchi, N. (2018). Contexts and pragmatics learning: Problems and opportunities of the study abroad research. Language Teaching, 51(1), 124–137. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444815000440.

Toshalis, E., & Nakkula, M. J. (2012). Motivation, engagement, and student voice. Job for the Future. https://www.jff.org/documents/2047/Motivation_Engagement_Student_Voice_0.pdf.

Ulum, Ö. G. (2015). A needs analysis study for preparatory class ELT students. European Journal of English Language Teaching, 1(1), 14-29. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.51774.

Unal, M., & Ilhan, E. (2017). A case study on the problems and suggestions in foreign language teaching and learning at higher education. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 5(6), 64–72. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v5i6.2302.

van Schaik, C. P., & Burkart, J. M. (2011). Social learning and evolution: The cultural intelligence hypothesis. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 366(1567), 1008–1016. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0304.

Wlodkowski, R. J., & Jaynes, J. H. (1991). Eager to learn: Helping children become motivated and love learning. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

Wu, Y.-C., Hsieh, L.-F., & Lu, J.-J. (2015). What’s the relationship between learning satisfaction and continuing learning intention? Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 191, 2849–2854. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.148.

Zhang, D., Han, J., Zhao, L., & Meng, D. (2019). Leveraging prior-knowledge for weakly supervised object detection under a collaborative self-paced curriculum learning framework. International Journal of Computer Vision, 127, 363–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11263-018-1112-4.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v40i1.32311

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


 

Social Media:

     

 

 Creative Commons License
Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan by Lembaga Pengembangan dan Penjaminan Mutu Pendidikan UNY is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/cp/index.

Translator
 
 web analytics
View Our Stats